A People\'s Constitution

In the article A Peoples ecesis, the author Howard Zinn explains his thoughts that the institution does non effect our quality of life. His ingest is not backed up by any facts or logic, but purely horizon by his own opinion. The system is in fact in truth useful to society because it gives citizens their rights and gives state their granting immunity. The wit of Rights keeps the government and citizens eachude by making au and thentic the government does not pass the nation and keeps things equal.\nZinn argues that the integrity and aspiration of the people is what gives us our rights and role. He states, It is conspicuously silent on certain other rights that all humans deserve. (Zinn, pg. 1) This statement contradicts itself because The ordinal amendment explains that people have more more rights than what is just say in our personality. He then goes on to talk approximately how thrall came to be abolished. When slavery was abolished, it was not by inherent fiat, but by the join of military necessity with the incorrupt force of a large antislavery movement, acting outside the Constitution and often against the law. (Zinn, pg. 1) The Thirteenth Amendment expands the license Proclamation which makes slavery black in all of the unify States and gives everyone equal freedom and rights. The Constitution is very effective in keeping our people equal and even though it did not clearly state this at first, it has been in tact since. Since the people fought for what they believed in, the government compromised and added it to the Constitution.\nZinn argues that the laws that protect citizens from withal much government power are easily ignored. The Bill of Rights is very effective, giving citizens the freedom of speech, religion, and press all in The First Amendment. Whatever a distant Court \ndecided, the true(a) right of citizens to free observation has been determined by the present(prenominal) power of the local patrol on th...