Making Connections Essay

In Werner, Hoeflich is share-out in truth intimate and specific details about his experience. Beard credibly met Hoeflich on several occasions in decree to gain his institutionalise before he was able to collect some of the details that he included in his subject. It well-nigh likely took Beard days of ask just the right questions to write Werner. In this gear up, Werner is presented as both dim and strong. In the beginning of the humbug, he is completely caught off guard by the fire in his home, but then the author follows with a figment of Werrner cliff diving.Beard imbibes Werner diving out of his apartment window with athletic elegance, and then proceeds to allege us about Werner crying in the ambulance. At the termination of the story, Beard describes Werner never being able to put off himself with the old Werner. I am left investigateing what Werner did after his accident. We bonk he always felt pain since, but I wonder in what other ways it affected his life. Zinner emphasizes balancing quotes with narrations which Beard did really well.He too spoke of not changing the quotes in order to preserve the characters voice. Beard did a very nice transaction of depicting Werners personality through the quotes he chose. 2. Gladwell began the piece by describing an event very vaguely, and then slowly gave us more details. He ended the story by teaching us champion of the lessons that Cesar learned through his experience. I like that Gladwell keeps us wondering at the beginning of his piece. He could be talking about any(prenominal) summate of things.I liked the ending because the reading was able to see another(prenominal) side of Cesar. Bow, not only was he an expert on suction stop behavior he knew quite a bit about compassionate behavior as well. I didnt like that he chose to describe Cesar in his introduction. I also didnt like that in the conclusion, he told a story of Cesar failing to be able to do his job. I would have describe Cesar after I finished telling the story of Sugar and Lynda. I would have told the story of Cesar failing before I talked about Cesar learning about human behavior.Gladwell did a uncorrupted job of hooking the reader. After the first sentence, I was left wondering what Gladwell was talking about. He also did a good job of knowing when to end the story. If he had continued on for much longer, the reader would have mazed interest. 3. Ingrams message was that this was she experienced was a very confusing cartridge clip for everyone. Not all Germans hated Jews, and not all Jews resented Americans. She wanted to submit a different perspective on the war than the ones we hear most often.When I was finished reading this piece, I felt a comprehend of sadness. Ingram wanted us to see that although the Hamburg heap were grateful for being saved, they were serene haunted by the sight of their dead neighbors and friends. In order for any good to deign, sacrifices had to be made. Ingram begins her memoir with a story of her bravely saving her mothers life and uses very frank and blunt lyric poem in order to establish power. Zinner recommends that an author write without being to bootless and to use vivid sight and smell language.Ingram did a very good job of painting a picture in the readers mind without making herself the hero in every situation. 4. Rodriguez was trying to tell us that there is a big change coming in California and in America. No longer do you have to come to California to live your dream. A person can stay at home and achieve it just as easily, but dont be surprised when it doesnt come true. I imagine that the consultation had a love/hate relationship with this piece. They thought it was beautifully scripted and brought up excellent points, but hated to admit that what Rodriguez was saying was true.In describing East Cobb, I would use the terms large houses, fast food, umpteen cultures, crowded schools, crowded streets, expensive cats, large lawns, family secrets, intelligent kids, and drug abuse. Rodriguez described the California that we all know, but he also went deeper and described to us in great detail the California that very few people see. 5. singer posed a question. Then, he spent a separate or two answering the question. He did this repeatedly throughout his work and added supporting details along the way. Singer gave a very convert argument.He appealed to the emotions of a sensitive reader with the child in the consortium analogy. HE appealed to the logic of a skeptical reader with all his statistics. This obligate would persuade most people to be more charitable. It would not generate a very convincing argument to the people with lower incomes. Singer did a very good job of cutting the clutter. He utilise simple language and said exactly what he meant. I also felt Singers personality through his writing. He is very realistic and believes that we should all be more charitable.